Prophets and Crazies

April 27th, 2010 by jplant

So I’m trying to put myself into the place of the people looking at and listening to the prophets. What would it be like?

And then I remember. I remember that there are plenty of people around to call out our lax western Christianity every day. They protest. They protest a lot. They protest too much.

Now, I’m usually not the most conservative person in any group and I’m certainly not the most liberal either. But it seems to me that many of us would turn our noses up at those who are taking radical steps of prophetic nature in our current context. No one sides with Westboro Baptist Church at soldier’s funerals. Not many are willing to accept John Piper’s comments about God punishing America. We laugh at the people who stand around in downtown Austin and tell people that fornicators and drunkards are going to hell. We call them crazy.

Could they be, in some way, our Jeremiahs? I know it might be unpopular to even think it, but could it be true?

Maybe in this sense the prophet becomes typological rather than simply being an individual. But what do we do with that? Do we continue to automatically dismiss everything that people who disagree with us say or do we begin looking at portions of their criticisms the way that we do the prophets?

Okay, you can hate me now.

On Empire and Scripture

April 20th, 2010 by jplant

In response to reading genvessel’s most recent post entitled “Empire and Scripture”, I would like give my own analysis.

First and foremost, we must never assume that any portion of the Bible could be inept at speaking to us in some way. I think the point might be easily made that most, if not all, of scripture might be more than we can understand contextually. Certainly, there are means by which we cannot understand the nature of what is being written and reported and lived and dealt with in scripture, but that is what makes the Bible so precious….it still speaks to us across vast expanse of elapsed time! Perhaps I may not understand the realm of the oppressed in terms of hunger and poverty and injustice. I do, however, understand social inequality, general apathy, social disorders, and the like…things that are native to me. And these things are addressed by the same work speaking to the aforementioned physical things.

Secondly, at what point does it stop being okay to be a blessed society? When the market crashes and people lose their retirement are we supposed to say, “Bless God, now I’m oppressed and can understand people better?” Or should we bemoan the loss of those things we worked hard for? I think that we see plenty of scripture that would support the latter. It’s all a matter of perspective.

And as far as “persons whom are undocumented” go, they are called “illegal aliens” for a reason. They are called this because they are not from our land, hence the term “alien”, and because they are illegally within our borders, hence “illegal”. Our society has set up rules that determine what should go on in order to preserve what is best for the entire citizenry. In doing so, we have decided that our borders should be closed. They are more than undocumented people, they are unwelcome people in terms of legality. Whether this is consistent with OT passage concerning aliens is another matter.

I think, however, that it is most correct to say that we should begin by admitting that we live in an empire and that we have much to learn from those who do not. We have much to learn from people who have felt physical hunger when all we’ve felt is the emotional equivalent. We cannot, though, completely discount our own roles in the narrative as evil. Instead, we must ask the question, “How can God’s kingdom be fashioned here?” That, I believe, is a more firm step toward redemption and reconciliation.

Isaiah

March 4th, 2010 by jplant

The Book of Isaiah is good. Real good.

I never realized how good until I went through it verse by verse in my Hebrew readings class last year with Dr. Reid. There are so many nuances and background stories that come into play and effect language use and subsequent interpretations…it’s a nerdy boy’s dream!

I think my favorite part is the part where Isaiah gets his lips cleaned off with the red hot coal. It’s really good because he is supposed to be a prophet. Now, prophets use what portion of themselves the most in their line of work? That’s right, their mouths. He needs his mouth cleaned! It’s as if he is saying, “God, the gifts you have given me already are not good enough to make things happen. I am completely inadequate even though you have equipped me.” He goes on to say that there is no way he can be good enough because he also dwells among people who are just as unclean as he is…so he has it extra bad! In response, God cleanses his lips and leaves him no room for excuses.

I think of this story from time to time when I don’t feel like doing the things that I know I should. Sometimes I don’t feel like I can make a difference, or that I am ever reaching the kids in my youth group, or that I am…you get the point. Because God uses people that feel inadequate. And I think God gets a special kick out of it somehow. Gideon. Moses. Esther. And so on.

I like knowing that God gets a kick out of me somehow. And I like knowing that somewhere a long time ago somebody else felt just as inadequate as I do sometimes today. But it worked out for them!

So, I guess it’ll work out for me.

FAQ Questions

March 4th, 2010 by jplant

1. Which Assyrian king laid siege against Jerusalem?

2. What year did the Assyrians lay siege against Jerusalem?

3. In his annals, what animal did Sennacherib liken Hezekiah to?

4. Why did Sennacherib attack Jerusalem?

Megalloth Questions

February 23rd, 2010 by jplant

1. Is Song of Songs written from a masculine or feminine perspective?

2. What country was Ruth from?

3. How was Ruth related to Boaz?

4. What was Ruth’s mother-in-law’s name?

5. Who is traditionally seen as the author of Ecclesiastes?

6. Who is the Lord’s footstool in Lamentations 2?

7. Who is responsible for stripping the tabernacle and casting off the altar in Lamentations?

8. What were the limits of Ahasuerus’ kingdom in story of Esther? (How far did it span?)

Poor Job

February 18th, 2010 by jplant

In listening to the story of Job growing up it always bothered me that there could be this cosmic being who played games with our lives like a video game. How could that be loving or good at all? It’s sick and twisted. And so I really didn’t like the story of Job. But lately I’ve been thinking I was just looking at the story wrong. Maybe.

I think it might be a tad ironic that Job’s name is Job. That somehow his name is spelled the same as the word job is more than ironic in that Job feels his entire condition is a reflection of the job he has done in serving God. Isn’t it?

And that’s how we are.

We tend to think that God is a being who rewards or punishes based upon our ability. I mean, it’s just easier. It’s our go-to move. Many of us were raised in traditions who at least implied the very same in some ways. Now, I don’t know if God is a God that necessarily punishes or rewards based on what I’ve done but I find a similiarity between the theology of the Book of Job and the theology of the cross.

Because in Job the overarching idea is that God can do whatever God chooses. Why? Because God is God. And even though Job and his friends think that their actions are what move God to do what God does or allows, the story makes it clear that God will “punish” and “reward” any that God may choose for whatever reason God chooses.

And I find continuity with that in the story of the cross. To quote Romans, none is righteous! None of us has done enough to earn or merit the great reward or blessing that has been placed in our hands by God, but because God can choose what God will do without regard to our actions or abilities, we were sent the Son to deliver us all.

And here’s the kicker.

On some level God still expects us to live righteously. God still rewarded Job for living righteously, on both chronological sides of his torment. In fact, his righteous living so impressed the Lord that it was his behavior that prompted the whole incident in the first place. Clearly, it’s important that Job led and continued to lead a righteous life.

And so for you and me. It is important that we make decisions that are righteous. Because just as God could choose to do what God would with Job, God has chosen to do with us what God wants. But just as God expected Job to live righteously and make righteous decisions, God expects us to respond and live righteously.

So the point is this; that, though God has chosen to do what God wants to do without regard to our actions, God expects that our actions outside of God’s decisions are still righteous.

That means in response to Christ. That means in our relationships with people. That means our relationship with the Earth. That means everything.

So I guess the story of Job isn’t that bad.

Questions about the Proverbs

February 8th, 2010 by jplant

1. Have the Proverbs always been attributed to Solomon? If not, how long is it estimated?

2. How do the Hebrew proverbs match up against other collections of proverbs throughout the world, especially the Ancient Near East?

3. Is the “pit” mentioned in Prov 1:12 a euphemism for grave?

4. Is Wisdom a forerunner of the messianic concept? Or perhaps even a collaborator of the messianic concept?

5. Who is (are) traditionally believed to have written Proverbs? Any ideas?

6. This is not a question, just an observation: The first seven chapters of proverbs are addressed to a man’s son(s). The question is…what is the significance? Because much of the work in proverbs reminds me of words that old school country dads and granddads tell kids about being a man.

7.

My thoughts on Psalms

February 2nd, 2010 by jplant

Psalms.

In my estimation there may not be a more enigmatic section of the Bible. At least for me. Something about the way the individual songs were constructed and the use of goats and horses and what not presents a world that, at best, is quite different and far removed from mine. So sometimes I just don’t get what the psalmists are talking about.

In reading through a portion of the Psalms this week, though, I found kindred spirits who spoke from across the expanse of history. I discovered people I had things in common with, people that understood me.

I am always struck by others’ abilities to simply forget about bad things that happen in the world and in their lives. It is as if they gloss over the meaningfully painful events of life in order to maintain a peace that, by all accounts, is fragile and precarious. Some of the psalmists, though, embrace the painful. They cling to the hurtful. They latch on to the uncomfortable. And then they pray to God that God will hear and relieve them. And I think that’s how it’s supposed to be done.

It isn’t healthy to simply replace the frown on your face with a smile like you would a Mr. Potato-head doll. But it’s not healthy to moan and complain and stay stuck in the rut either. No, the lesson from the psalmists is that we must embrace these things in order to fully experience life and then to make our petitions known to God so that we might have life even more abundantly as we rely on our God to not only save us, but experience our condition with us and understand where we are coming from when no one else can.

And that’s why the Psalms have been good to me this week.

Josh’s FAQ’s on Psalms

January 28th, 2010 by jplant

1. When and how did certain Psalms become attributed to David?

2. How long of a period is estimated for the authorship and gathering of the Psalms?

3. What’s the deal with the 151st Psalm in the Apocrypha and not in the canonical writings?

4. How diverse are the backgrounds of the authors of the Psalms? eg., Priestly, Elohist, Pre-exilic, Post-exilic, etc.

My background

January 24th, 2010 by jplant

I grew up in a Pentecostal church and since going to church have moved into the Baptist world I currently attend to churches on Sundays, Columbus Ave. Bapt. Church and Grace Family Church. I lead worship at Grace Family Church and act as their youth pastor. I also lead worship at Baylor’s chapel on Wednesdays with Ryan Richardson. I have been preaching, though I am not ordained, and leading worship since I was about fourteen and I’ve always loved it. I always enjoy going somewhere and just being a part, but to me being a pastor is much better than anything else I could do. I went to college at the University of Mary Hardin-Baylor in Belton, TX and had a double major in History and Christian Studies. After Truett I plan on teaching in a local high school and coaching while continuing to preach and lead worship. I think this course will help me to put things in Scripture in better perspective. As already mentioned, I was a history major and things just seem to make more sense for me when understanding them from a historical perspective.