Part I- click here

So the Brother and Sister make their way through the woods and finally stumble into a clearing with a house made of bread and sugar.  Famished, Hansel and Gretel rush to the feast before their eyes and begin to indulge themselves.  They hear a voice:

“Nibble, nibble, Little Mouse

Who is nibbling on my house?”

 

The children answer:

“The wind, the wind; it’s very mild,
            blowing like the Heavenly Child.”

 . .  .and they continue to eat.  What were the siblings thinking?  Acting impulsively according to supposed ‘need’ they pushed thought aside.  Of course they could have satisfied need with any number of available nuts, roots, berries or other items that take time and patience to satisfy desire, but once presented with a fantasy, they forgot to weigh the difference between their wants & needs. 

Suddenly a door in the cottage opens and an old woman steps out.  She is old, like a grandmother, and Hansel and Gretel, feeling at ease with her appearance, accept her invitation to enter the cottage. So ensues the well-known  process of entering Baba Yaga’s cottage in the woods!  Like Little Red Riding Hood and any number of other well-known tales, we HAVE to go to the woods and find the crone.  For one, we’ll never make it out of the woods if we don’t!

When Daniel-san visits Mr. Myagi, his teacher never seems to teach him karate!  How frustrating is that for Daniel?  Instead, Mr. Myagi insists he “wax on; wax off” and “sand the floor.”  Daniel does not understand, but he does as his teacher commands.   This is because Daniel is quite different than Hansel.  He is both worthy & willing.  He follows the teacher’s commands even when he doesn’t see the end from the beginning.  Daniel has no inkling that “wax-on; wax-off” has anything to do with the “The Crane” position he will ultimately take in the ring when he faces-off against his enemy.  He also does not realize (in the beginning) that he has so many OTHER things to learn along the way that are so much more important.  Is the reason for Mr. Myagi’s commands the Crane position?  Is it so Daniel can catch flies with chopsticks?  Or is it so he can make choices about life and when he does, have the ability to carry through on the desires of his heart?  When he enters the ring, the crane position is inside him.  When the monsoon hits, it is Daniel-san who has the confidence and fortitude to rescue and persevere even against the forces of nature.  He is not just training his body when he endlessly performs “sand-the-floor”; rather he is forming his character.  He is also finding out who he is and what he can expect from himself. 

What a marvelous thing that is! It’s something Hansel & Gretel don’t yet know.  They tell “the witch” they are not anything, and maybe they don’t yet know either?

What does Baba Yaga demand?  We know the #1 rule when encountering Baba Yaga in the woods:  Feed the Crone!  But what does that mean?  How will I know when I meet the crone, and what do I feed “her?”  First, know this:  you cannot go looking for the crone; the Crone comes looking for you.  There’s a well-known saying: 

When the student is ready                                             the teacher appears. 

What does this mean?  It means that the burden is on each of us to seek and find our self in the woods, searching.  Once there, Really&Truly there…searching out the nooks and crannies, walking the byways:  the Crone appears.  If & when we feed the crone, the path appears. 

Like Daniel-san, Hansel & Gretel are lulled by the mild appearance of the Crone: the grand-fatherly/grand-motherly demeanor of the teacher.  The Crone is not a Nursemaid, though.  If we are looking for a Nursemaid, that is a sure sign that we don’t belong in the woods!   If we want/need a Nursemaid, we must still be in the castle.

            When the princes s discovers the truth about her existence:  that her very birth coincided with a horrible curse, the doom for her brothers who became swans by day, she knows that she has found her quest.  The hero princess emerges.  However, she lives in a castle, and leaving a castle is not as easy as it seems, for the heroine, like all of us, lives in a complex structure of a multitude of duties, traditions, ideologies, desires, wants and needs, all pulling at her in various ways.  These form the rooms that make up her existence, and can even be a labyrinth of sorts.  How does one find the way out?  Even recognizing the need to leave the castle is an amazing feat, but needing to leave the castle (and go to the woods) and wanting to leave the castle to embark on a quest is not the same as actually finding the map to the door and attaining the key to the portcullis that bars the way. 

Like Hansel, Harry must face the lure of the past . . .

In traditional lore, the hero or heroine must find the old retainer or the Nursemaid to receive the knowledge that provides the clue to leaving the castle.  It is always arduous.    It often requires a Mirror of True Seeing.  Even Harry Potter finds it difficult to process looking in the Mirror of True Seeing, and he’s a “true” hero! 

Bread is Basic

Bread is Important

Bread is Precious

 In the story of the Twelve Wild Swans, the Princess Hero finds her Nursemaid in the dungeon, though, discovers the story of her birth, hears about her brothers, and  this gives her not only the courage to leave, but also the means to do so.  She enters the woods and we would think she  is now ready for her quest, but NO!  What does one do in the woods, and how does a hero[ine] find his or her way?  She is ready, and the Crone appears.  Fortunately, the Princess feeds the crone a loaf of bread.  As Red Riding Hood’s mother stresses, she must take the basket of food to “grandmother.”

In the old tales emanating out of medieval times bread represents what is most basic and simultaneously most precious.  There are times when famine and devastation last so long that city documents do not record a date, but instead just list an event “in the time of the Great Famine” because that is enough explanation.  Bread is the staff of life.  It is also the most basic of foods.  It is foundational and precious at the same time.  Much like “wax-on; wax-off” or “sand-the-floor,” or “paint-the-fence.”  Whatever the Crone asks, it will be basic.  It will be difficult to give, because it will be hard to do, and therefore a sacrifice and precious.   Is it useful?  Yes.  DOes the Crone need it?  No.  The student must give everything.  Ultimately, once given, the student gains all that is necessary for the next step. 

 Baba Yaga puts Gretel to work, learning how to be a woman of confidence.  Gretel learns and learns well.  How do we know this?  We know, because when it comes time, Gretel is capable of the fire; she can be cooked / refined.  She is “finished.”  Complete.  She passes the test.  What about Hansel?  He does not pass the test.  His actions place him in a cage.  He cannot be himself; instead he uses a fake bone that he passes off as a measure of his worth, and it is puny indeed.  He will not be cooked because he cannot face the fire.  He will never understand who/what the Crone is.  To Hansel, and to the Brothers Grimm also, the Crone is a witch.  How interesting is that?  Does that mean Hansel never left home?

Brother and Sister

It begins with a boy and a girl.  They are brother and sister, so this is not a romantic tale.  The important fact that the story begins with two siblings means that this is a teaching tale, and that we—each of us, male and female–have something to learn.  This has something to do with communal memories and a shared past that is meant to be passed on in the oldest manner known: through story.  As the listeners, we are drawn into the dark and forbidding forest as Hansel and Gretel[1] embark on the quest that will determine their future.  We make a mistake if we think they are fleeing the past; in that liminal moment when the hero and/or heroine decides to take that momentous step forward into the Uncertain Future the Self is formed, along with all the interstitial power of Possibility inherent to this process.  Before that pivotal first step, any direction is possible, and thus, a myriad of potential outcomes await.  Ahead, both danger and wonder lurk in potentially equal measure.  This is partly why we say what qualifies a person as a hero or a heroine is that that the hero is both willing and worthy.  Choice is involved from the first moments, even when the outcome is uncertain or unknown.  

The wonderful story of Hansel and Gretel also reveals to us how important is that aspect of worthiness, though this 

Hansel as each of us

 might be measured differently depending on who and when.  Folk tales are  simultaneously universal and particular.  Common virtues bind all people generally throughout time, so we find similar tales throughout history.  We could almost say there are no new stories, just versions adapted for the particulars of each region, if we understand that the stories of each group of people were passed on orally and then adapted according to the living conditions and the needs of the people who “owned” the tales.   

My Gramma Bea was a master storyteller.  She lived in the northern-most tip of Maine, so every winter she came to stay with us in California where it was warm.  My childhood is full of laptime with my grandmother reading to me, wisdom imparted from across the room via the comfort of a wise woman in sturdy shoes –even at 6am–who spoke in that matter-of-fact way of a downeaster  of “the way things are” while she simultaneoulsy concocted applesauce cake or poured “real” maple syrup on my pancakes.  I will forever be the product of her efforts to pass on what it is to be human.  It is difficult to imagine the me without the memory of her deep inside, including snuggle time with Gramma Bea, because she stayed in my room, lucky me, and at night when I was scared, she would climb in bed with me, wrapping her warm, flannel-nightgown-covered arms around me:  “What’s wrong, Little Gabrielle?” she would ask, and I would tell her about my fears and night horrors.  “Really?” she would say, and even though it was dark, even now, I vividly picture her face, solemnly pondering my dilemma as if it were the most serious of considerations.  “Well, let me tell you about. . . .” she would begin, and then she would embark on one of the old stories of long ago.  I  never questioned the amazing coincidence of the heroine. . . “Once there was a girl named Gabrielle.”  I would ask “How old was she?”  and she would answer, “Oh, I believe she was just about your age, oh my…isn’t that interesting?”  I was enthralled and soothed.  I was formed early in my youth and well into adulthood.  When I later encountered these tales of long ago, they felt like old friends; I recognized my sisters and mothers from the many histories of communal memory that shaped their world and mine.       

The Dark & Scary Forest

Those aspects of folk and fairy tale are the pieces of communal memory that link us together, and must be shared as we affirm our humanity and attempt to bridge the gap of generations, fears & joys, miscommunications, calamities, differences, defeats, jubilations, and other commonalities that bind & separate us equally.   The particulars of a story that have existed time-out-of-mind restore the memory banks of what needs to be passed on to the next generation. . . and the next:  all those “things” that have been forgotten:  just as two children who are lost in the woods might need to recall macro & micro knowledge in order to survive a new and potentially hostile environment.  We KNOW the woods exist, but can we go there and find our way there too?  

 All who set out on the quest do not discover the wherewithal required for the self individuation that will allow them to become who they feel they are called to be.  Wishing doesn’t make it so.  ‘Should’ is not a concrete concept.  Like Hansel & Gretel, we do not always know why we feel called or from where the call originates.  Sometimes we just know we have to GO!  Maybe our parents are the ones pushing, knowing something we do not!!  So the Little Brother and the Little Sister venture forth. . .or do they? 

It is interesting that Hansel and Gretel know this is their time to go and their parents are very involved in ensuring that their son and daughter move on to the next phase in life.  In some versions the mother is more vehement and even has to convince the father.  In the middle of the night, Mother and Father talk about their children’s new lives, and how they must go live on their own.  And that’s just it, isn’t it?  No one else can be the “self” for us!  All the teaching and learning in the world is only worth what we make of it individually.  Unfortunately, what Hansel and Gretel overhear makes them anxious—even afraid.   Hansel gathers the means to return back home in the form of little white rocks, which he puts in his pockets.  The pebbles anchor him to his childhood home, and Gretel stays close to Hansel.  Despite Mother’s and Father’s efforts to leave them in the big, wide world, the trail they leave leads them right back home even without the presence of their parents.

What happened?  And what about those little pebbles in Hansel’s pockets; what do they signify?  How difficult is it to leave a place when we don’t really leave; when we take it with us in pieces and fragments in our pockets or other places of our minds and hearts that serve to forge a path that pulls us backwards rather than a beacon of strength to guide or impel us forward?  

Sometimes it seems too difficult to make it on our own in the cold, dark woods without the creature comforts to which we’ve grown accustomed.  This is a familiar phenomenon.  In modern day, the trend has become so common that it has a name:  Boomerang Kids.  The phenomenon of college students who graduate only to return home to live with their parents is on the rise.  Many do not find work, and even more simply decide to continue living at home, in fact: 40% of 2006 graduates remain or have returned to their parent’s homes.    

Back to the woods with Hansel and Gretel and their parents’ sending them away, again!  The particulars of this tale (once it is codified by the Brothers Grimm) tell us the context of this version of the story:  certainly this is a time of scarcity and perhaps even fear.  The ubiquitous and dangerous woods were omnipresent.  If the tale had been written in today’s modern world with the current economic fears and obsession with Wall Stree figures along with inner city crime, could a parallel be drawn?  How do parents send their children off into the jungle that is the great big, wide, scary world to fend for themselves?

Through the Woods . . .to Grandmother's House

The next time Hansel and Gretel leave, there will be no pebbles; no mementos.  Mother and Father leave them in the woods with only a bit of bread. 

 We have to go to the woods; all fairy tales suggest this universal truth.  Even Little Red Riding Hood’s mother warns her daughter of the dangers lurking in the woods, yet nevertheless sends Red Riding Hood with the crucial bread to meet the old woman in the forest!   

What do Hansel and Gretel do?  They can think of only one thing:  we need to go home!  So they squander their bread on laying a trail, but there is no going home of course, and they soon become lost in the woods.  Apparently even heaven conspires against them for birds eat the bread crumb trail.  If we have not already realized it, now we know that something beyond our own understanding is happening here, because the gods do not want the children to return home.  We know this, because the presence of birds in the story always speaks of a heavenly presence.  

Even so, we feel for these poor, pitiful children left all alone in the forest.  We might even be outraged at this seeming abandonment.  Leaving one’s child to fend for him or her self:  is this right?  Fair? Natural?  Did Mother and Father provide enough training & teaching before they left them in the woods?  Were they given enough food?  Did they absorb enough hugs & kisses?   Is it EVER enough and how do we know?  Hansel & Gretel, alone in the woods, bereft and hungry, abandoned by those who were supposed to “love” them most of all people in the whole wide world….and now, they will experience “the world” as it is exemplified by the scariest, most mysterious, dark version of it:  the deep, dark, woods! 

The tale is ambiguous enough that it applies to everyone.  The children are left alone as are all of us once it is time to grow up.  Decisions must be made.  Whatever was learned in childhood or young adulthood (whosever fault that is or is not) will now be part of the path they tread.  They must make the most of it.  Hansel hears what sounds like a chopping axe, and he thinks of his father, but he is not sure how to make the sound himself.  He runs after the chopping sound thinking to find his father, never once imagining that it might be HIS responsibility to duplicate it here, in the woods, where trees mean shelter and warmth.  Soon the children are hopelessly lost, and they will have to find another way to learn how to become who they are called to be.    

The next stage of the Journey

Some people never find the path through the woods, but because this is a teaching tale,   Hansel & Gretel are about to encounter one of the oldest figures of fairy tale: the crone.  Will they pass the test and emerge triumphant?  They find the path and come to a clearing with a fantastical cottage.  It seems as though it has been waiting just for them . . . and perhaps it has?  Is this what they’ve been taught to do/how to be?  Remember, this is a Teaching Tale.  

Once again, the Little Brother and the Little Sister venture forth. . . 


[1] The original tales in the German region referred only to “the Little Sister” and “the Little Brother” but the Brothers Grimm popularized the story using the German version of John and Jane Doe:  Hansel and Gretel, which codified what was a universal tale into that particular version ever since.

Damon & Pythias

The semester seems to be a cycle of I-love-this-part-of-the-semester moments.  How do I choose the best one?  Apparently, they’re all my favorite!  The story of Damon and Pythias Is short but incredibly rich.  Is it more important to have a friend like this or to be such a friend?  When King Dionysius reacts to the example the two young men set in their willingness to sacrifice for each other AND in the trust they display, what is it that he desires?  We come back once again to that wonderful phrase Do ut Des, and the idea that we must give in order to receive.  No one who is already full can receive, and it is the giving itself that makes us receivable.  Dionysius, of course, clearly wants to receive, but he also obviously doesn’t get the “giving” part.  He seems to think that he can order friendship as if he can declare something is so by his command. 

How superficial (& boring!) would that be, if all the relationships in our life came about because and in the way that we decided that they should?  I love the slow learning about a person that happens over time, like peeling back paper thin layers of an onion, one-at-a-time.  To look at an onion is to see a large white or yellow, round vegetable, but each layer is sooo transparent and smooth….wow:  it seems as if we ought to be able to look through them to the very center of onion-ness!  But no, the only way to discover the layers is to patiently allow each one to peel.  If we cut into it suddenly, all we’ll ever discover is a cut up onion.  The transparency disappears, not because it’s gone, but because it’s unavailable to us, the impatient ones!  People are like that too, I think.  If we push for instant knowing, we may think we’ve been given a response, but all we’re seeing is the structure of the person, and not the inner reality that can only be known over time, one layer at a time.  I’m wondering if friendship is like this too?  Perhaps the layers that make up a coupleship (of any kind)  are many layers deep, each one obviously part of the whole once discovered and recognized, but only transparent when recognized through insight, understanding, and knowing. 

Maybe a more important question arises:  how do I know when my “giving” is actually a gift, and not a roundabout way to enable receiving?  That’s really Dionysius’ problem, right?  He’s trying to figure out how to “have” a friendship, so he wants to know what to DO to get it.  We could ask ourselves this question in the larger, global construct, as with Haiti.  It’s probably good to travel to Haiti and “help,” but I find it fascinating how our brand of “help” looks so very American and Christian-imperialistic.  I’m not Haitian, but I know that I don’t particularly like it when someone who thinks they are better, bigger, stronger, richer, or whater “er” we could name comes along and decides to “help” me… placing me in his/her/their debt.  In my experience, he/she/they don’t typically know what I need and certainly aren’t going to stick around long enough to find out… We could also think of it on a more personal level.  I have many times struggled with the question of Gift Giving.  Is it better to give a gift that I will enjoy giving to a person I care for, thus sharing something of myself with him or her, something I think that person needs, or something that person wants, even if it’s something I do not care for?  What if it’s something that person REALLY likes and I REALLY don’t like?  What if I have a passion for something I think is wonderful and want to share it, but the person I’m giving to really does NOT like it?  These might seem like simple questions, but when real names and items are applied to the concepts, it becomes more difficult. 

My daughter Amanda is the best gift giver I know of.  She is creative and intuitive.  For Valentines Day this year she sent me a little stuffed animal Panda Bear so that I would think of her (Amanda-Panda) and a little children’s picture book called “I love my Mommy” and it was page after page of Mommy and Baby animals.  Before you say awwwwwwww . . . it gets better.  On each of the pages, she placed sticky notes and scribbled little messages to me like “This reminds me of me and you when I was little.”  I don’t know if that was the perfect gift for everyone, or just the perfect gift for ME.  I know she did it with me in mind.  It also makes the layers in the heartstrings between us stronger, deeper, richer.  She gave and I was filled.  When I am filled, I am better able to give.

Perhaps the best reason to work at home?

I was joking with my friend Amy the other night about how much we each must have liked homework when we were in school, because we chose a profession that guaranteed we’d never be without it!  We were talking on the phone instead of meeting for dinner because we both had a stack of papers to grade—not to mention monographs to read if we finished the grading.  Did we know when we started on this path that we would always & forever be doing homework?  It seems that the more tools we add to our arsenal, the more work we do!  I’m thinking that something needs to be re-evaluated!

I’m in this New Media seminar facilitated by Gardner Campbell, and I don’t think he actually told us [up front] how much homework he would be assigning. . .   Hmmmmm.  The “homework” he assigns is not onerous; nevertheless it takes up time.  It makes me think about the tasks I assign my students and about what is necessary vs. what is pleasurable and the value of either or both. I’m stewing over this question, searching for meaning beyond the surface, perhaps  because this has an application to what we are reading in the New Media seminar.   Do new gadgets and tools make the burden lighter or perhaps even change the focus or even the the nature of our work?  There could be a danger in that.   I don’t want to start on a discussion of I-am-what-I-do. . . but this sort of begs the question, doesn’t it?  I’m headed into deep waters here, and so I want to back up to gadgets and tools:  they hold such an appeal because they add value to our work and play.  They both simplify AND complicate our lives. 

Do you remember the earliest e-mail programs?  As I read “Personal Dynamic Media,”  and thought about the seeming prescience of Alan Kay and Adele Goldberg in 1977 regarding electronic tools of the Imagined Future, envisioning the “small talk”  and “dynabook” that would someday be the laptop, I recalled those early word processing programs we all used, and then my first experiences with e-mail when the owner of a brand new home town internet company drove to my house in his little beatup car to give me a floppy disk so I could install Eudora on my A drive.   If only we could have envisioned THEN where all that would lead, huh?

Do you remember your old computer?

 “I think this will work,” he said.  “If it doesn’t, let me know, and we’ll figure something out.”  I wondered if that meant I was his first actual customer.  (Now his company is a multi-million dollar entity covering half a state and beyond!)  Nevermind.  I couldn’t wait to get started!  I asked if you remembered, and wow—I sometimes remind myself about those days of continuous waiting between commands, constant computer crashing due to who-knows-what, and no questions asked….we all just booted up again and told whoever might be on the ‘other end’ “sorry, computer crashed,” and continued on.  No worries.  ASCII and ms-dos were a way of life.  Now, when I call my nationally-based ISP it’s not so hometown-ey, and I try to laugh about all this when the well-meaning computer tech on the ‘other end’ insists on spelling ping and ipconfig one letter at a time with identifying alpha-mnemonics.  They are “teaching” me in ways I don’t even need; helping me traverse a different kind of language barrier.  What is that about?  I no longer accept computer crashing, and I want to know why the internet is slow or absent.  There are certain tools I NEED and then…. I think about why I need it.  Is my sense of urgency so I can grade papers online till all hours?  That seems like perhaps the internet is controlling MY life, rather than existing as a tool to make life somehow better.  What happened to efficiency and pleasure being the reason I wanted these tools?  Do the tools I have helped create and shape own me?

Orson Scott Card’s Ender’s Game  might be my favorite book series of all time.  (It’s always at least in my top 5.)  Far and away, my favorite character is Jane.  I like to say that I identify with Jane, although my daughter says, “No Mom, you’re not Jane; you’re the Hive Queen.”  That, I suppose is a different story for another day….  Anyway, Jane is an anomaly, much like the internet, who exists existentially as she is accessed by those who utilize her.  She is as powerful as they want her to be, and her sense of her “self” (if we can call it that) is relative to their use.  Interestingly, Card wrote the story and developed the character before the internet was “born,”  so in some ways his envisioning of the character “Jane” is similar to what we have encountered in the dynamics posed by J.C.R. Licklider in his article “Man-Computer Simbiosis” and Doug Engelbart in “Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework.”  Much of the drama in Card’s universe surrounds the idea of the bond between Ender, the main character, and Jane.  As with the question posed by Licklider and Engelbert: whether or not a tool is an extension of our self or whether a tool replicates human action and perhaps becomes something else.  This is, of course, often the “stuff” of science fiction, but it’s an important question.  How important our tools become in the way we Imagine our individual worlds and the Universe shapes the way we live our lives and direct the course of the future.  If we cannot function in any meaningful way without the present configuration of our tools, then I wonder what that means about our self qua self?  When Ender turns Jane “off” he irrevocably alters his life—and Jane’s, but she does not die.  Jane has by that time become so pervasive throughout the entire world and exists in so many places/in so many ways that she exists elsewhere and elsehow.  In a combination of ultimate grief and rage at the rejection from Ender, Jane actually goes on to control the entire Universe, like a goddess with ultimate power. 

Demeter

Just as ancient Greeks had to learn the lessons Demeter taught in order to assuage the goddess’ rage so they could enjoy the fruits of the land, the people in Card’s world have to follow the rules Jane establishes in order to access the power she holds (which they need/want).

In our New Media Seminar, we talk about this same process.  Many participants have talked about the so-called rules & protocols that exist for the privilege of talking and dealing with machines.  Tools, by their nature exist in a world of rules.  It doesn’t seem to matter if they are created in our image, or if they exist as extensions or as replications.  We as human beings have to follow certain protocols in order to utilize their power.  And we want to

There are lots of tricky new media gadgets, toys, & tools to play with, and many of them make our classrooms better learning environments, but I wonder how many of them serve as extensions of who we really are and which of them turn us into the tool itself.  I don’t really want to BE Jane.  I would like to be partnered with “her” in some way that makes my classroom richer.  I can benefit from Jane’s access to the Universe beyond my reach.  She can probably help me traverse the places where the language barrier still exists.  The key is probably to find the on/off button, and to determine which tools fit the individual circumstances and identifying markers that would truly enrich life and add depth and meaning to my students’ experiences.  Is that why I keep assigning myself homework?

© 2012 An Adventuremental Journey Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Spam prevention powered by Akismet