in which i find myself potentially sympathetic to ted haggard
January 27, 2011 — genvesselSo, in light of my post yesterday about knowing both sides of every story, I present to you this article on Pastor Ted Haggard, found in GQ and written by the guy who wrote this.
I want to say up front that I am not a fan of Haggard’s for any number of reasons, including some comments he made to the general assembly of NYWC this past November. I find his theology to be far away from mine and his orthopraxy to be wanting. I join some of his congregants in registering their skepticism that his honesty is true.
All that being said, I swore to know both sides of stories and here’s a great opportunity to hear Haggard’s.
There are sensational things in here about his sexual proclivities that is being buzzed about on the internet – what he did with whom and so on and so forth – but I am not interested in those. I am interested in how he talked about his church. I quote:
Ted’s true sore spot, the thing that drains the life from his voice, is the way he and Gayle were treated by their church in the wake of the scandal. “Here I was, feeling like I’d wasted my life,” Ted says. “And they just sent me away.”When Ted resigned from New Life, a board of church-appointed overseers presented him with a separation agreement that required him to cut off all contact with members of the church, stay away from the media, perform no ministry-related work, and move his family out of Colorado. As severance, the church would provide fourteen months’ salary for him and Gayle (about $200,000) and assorted other benefits. Ted obediently signed the agreement, but he now believes it was excessively harsh treatment for a family in the midst of a major crisis—especially since, well, isn’t providing mercy for sinners sort of the entire point of Christianity?
As Roose rightly points out in the following paragraph, this has been Haggard’s party line since the incident. Many congregants at New Life – including acquaintances of mine – have been interviewed saying they took the only action they knew how to heal from the abuses he bestowed upon them. I do not want to take away from that reality or the fact that those people felt completely betrayed by their spiritual leader. And perhaps that monologue is just as two-faced as his critics believe. Or perhaps it’s not that simple. I have no idea.
Having multiple sides of the story does not mean that any situation is black and white. There is hurt on both sides and pain on all sides and deep damage. I felt my heart go out to Haggard’s family – especially his children – and his wife as I read this article. There are no guidebooks to surviving public disgrace and I deeply hope they had and have community around them to help them reconstruct.
I don’t have any grand conclusions from this different than my last post. It’s also not the only event which has happened in my life recently to remind me that all sides of stories deserve their due, regardless of how angry or nauseous or indignant any particular side makes me. So I offer this example of potential dissonance to you, my readers. Do with it what you will.







