Ezra-Nehemiah
January 25, 2010 — crcanaryDuring my readings of Ezra-Nehemiah the past week, I had plenty of time to contemplate the books in line with the Chronicles. These treatises also look at the Israeli history through a divine perspective. However, in contrast to the Chronicles, there seems to be more emphasis on the direct actions of the imperial kings and politicians: Emperors write edicts, retract them, halt the work, allow it to be resumed. Politicians write to emperors to oppose the rebuilding based on the history of Jerusalem as a rebellious place; others write to the emperors to resume rebuilding based upon the political history and edict of Cyrus.
What also seems to be in contrast from the books of Chronicles, is the diminishing role of the Davidic monarchy. With Ezra, the King of Persia himself sends the scribe back to Jerusalem to teach the law to the people (7:11-28). Of course, this is still seen as a providential work of the God of Israel. In Nehemiah, the cupbearer to Artaxerxes, finds favor in the king’s presence and is commissioned to return and rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. Both of these examples show that there seems to be more emphasis on the imperial power rather than the Davidic ideal.
There are a couple FAQ questions that I think would be beneficial for the quiz: 1.) Which king in the book of Ezra discontinues the work of the Temple? (Artaxerxes)
2.) Which king in the book of Ezra allows the rebuilding to be resumed? (Darius)
3.) What were the occupations of Ezra and Nehemiah? (Scribe, and Cupbearer)
4.) What practice was abolished in Nehemiah 5? (Usury)