The book of Proverbs has multiple verses that describe the interaction between the king and his subjects. Some of these verses argue that the reign of the king is “established through righteousness” (16:12). Other verses speak of the king’s wrath and might (16:14-15). Each “empire statement” is made with certain assumptions in mind. First, the king is in charge. He is not to be questioned or vexed in any way. Second, God established the monarchy. There is no separation of cult and state; the cult and state serve each other’s interests. This second claim is problematic. The author of I Samuel views the establishment of the monarchy as a rejection of Yahweh’s authority. The book of Exodus appears to be very anti-empire. There are conflicting views throughout Scripture on this issue.
Pro-empire statements are also made in the New Testament. Paul argues that Christians are to obey governmental authorities because they are placed in their positions by God for the good of Christians. However, we must remember that Paul was a Roman citizen who benefited from the empire on more than one occasion. In contrast, we have Peter and the apostles in Acts 4-5. Peter argues that we must obey God rather than men.
When we see statements that support the empire, we must remember who is writing these statements. Often, a high ranking official or someone who has directly benefited from the empire in some way. However, I would argue that the empire is always self-serving. The empire will always oppress the weak and the poor for its own ends. This is very different from my understanding of the kingdom of God. God is on the side of the oppressed and the poor. For those of us who call themselves his followers, we must side with the poor…not the empire.